What's the point of the music industry continuing their arguments on piracy and losing revenues (or worse, regular people "stealing" revenues) when you can legally have pretty much any music video stream to your computer? The ease of listening to any music anywhere has gotten to the ridiculous point where you can have a continuous stream of music (and video) on a window of your browser at excellent quality with zero cost (and no ads usually) just by doing a search on the Google+ YouTube widget.
And how long before this happens for movies? :)
Google+: View post on Google+
Related
Awesome Oatmeal comic about trying something as simple as watching your favorite show online http://bit.ly/Aeok0T To quote Valve's Gabe Newell: "We think there is a fundamental misconception about piracy. Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem. If a pirate offers a product anywhere in the…
// #Dailymotion has been doing revenue deals with big sites like Yahoo! and The Huffington Post, but recently they have opened their platform for smaller sites as well. The basic idea is that you embed Dailymotion videos in your site, ads are server and you get 30% of Dailymotion's net ad…
For every video that YouTube is removing, another 3 copies of the same song are posted. You can now find hundreds of thousands (if not millions?) of songs on YouTube. Lawsuits like the one mentioned in the article are dropped. Meanwhile the poor souls who uploaded 10 songs 5 years…